https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779385 CESTAT CHANDIGARH - AT allowed the appeal, holding that the question of CENVAT credit on duty paid for capital goods and inputs in telecom operations is settled by the SC, which affirmed entitlement of credit to telecom operators. A Larger Bench of CESTAT MUMBAI limited that SC finding to "input" (not "input service") in disputes over classification, and found no break in the CENVAT chain for input services. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779385 CESTAT CHANDIGARH - AT allowed the appeal, holding that the question of CENVAT credit on duty paid for capital goods and inputs in telecom operations is settled by the SC, which affirmed entitlement of credit to telecom operators. A Larger Bench of CESTAT MUMBAI limited that SC finding to "input" (not "input service") in disputes over classification, and found no break in the CENVAT chain for input services. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779385