<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47124</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the Notifications initiating a new shipper review, dismissing the petition challenging the initiation process. The court found no evidence of mala fide intent in initiating the review before the final anti-dumping duty imposition. It determined that the review complied with Rule 22 of the 1995 Rules and addressed concerns about the impact on the domestic industry due to the suspension of anti-dumping duty. The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the designated authority to entertain the review application and emphasized the importance of expeditious completion of investigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47124</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the Notifications initiating a new shipper review, dismissing the petition challenging the initiation process. The court found no evidence of mala fide intent in initiating the review before the final anti-dumping duty imposition. It determined that the review complied with Rule 22 of the 1995 Rules and addressed concerns about the impact on the domestic industry due to the suspension of anti-dumping duty. The court affirmed the jurisdiction of the designated authority to entertain the review application and emphasized the importance of expeditious completion of investigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>