<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 213 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779417</link>
    <description>ITAT (DEL) held that higher sales shown in a third party&#039;s GST return alone did not justify addition under s.69C. On verifying ledgers and books, purchases admitted were Rs.30,42,821, not Rs.76,10,580. The Tribunal modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order, directed the AO to estimate gross profit at 5% on the admitted purchases, and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 213 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779417</link>
      <description>ITAT (DEL) held that higher sales shown in a third party&#039;s GST return alone did not justify addition under s.69C. On verifying ledgers and books, purchases admitted were Rs.30,42,821, not Rs.76,10,580. The Tribunal modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order, directed the AO to estimate gross profit at 5% on the admitted purchases, and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>