<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 214 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779418</link>
    <description>ITAT upholds CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalty under s.271D for alleged contravention of s.269SS. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s view that the assessee received a cash loan of Rs.25 crore to be erroneous and there was no evidence of any actual cash payment by the purported payer. As no violation of s.269SS occurred, no penalty was leviable; the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the CIT(A) order was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 214 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779418</link>
      <description>ITAT upholds CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalty under s.271D for alleged contravention of s.269SS. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s view that the assessee received a cash loan of Rs.25 crore to be erroneous and there was no evidence of any actual cash payment by the purported payer. As no violation of s.269SS occurred, no penalty was leviable; the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the CIT(A) order was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>