<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 216 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779420</link>
    <description>ITAT, Ahmedabad allowed the appeal, holding the assessee met the onus to prove interest paid claimed as a deduction under s.57. The tribunal found the assessee earned roughly Rs.60 lakh interest and paid about Rs.55 lakh, reflecting an overall 12% interest position, and accepted the explanation that certain parties listed had no loans in the relevant year and opening balances supported the payment. CIT(A)&#039;s rejection was set aside and the deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 216 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779420</link>
      <description>ITAT, Ahmedabad allowed the appeal, holding the assessee met the onus to prove interest paid claimed as a deduction under s.57. The tribunal found the assessee earned roughly Rs.60 lakh interest and paid about Rs.55 lakh, reflecting an overall 12% interest position, and accepted the explanation that certain parties listed had no loans in the relevant year and opening balances supported the payment. CIT(A)&#039;s rejection was set aside and the deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>