https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47122 A conviction under customs and foreign exchange laws was sustained on the basis of a voluntary recorded statement and corroborating circumstances. The Court rejected the claim that part of the statement had been inserted by officers, treating that challenge as an afterthought, and held that the use of the word "we" was consistent with joint conduct by the accused. The surrounding facts, including interception of the vehicle at odd hours, the appellant's presence in the car, recovery of foreign-marked gold chips from the dicky, and the conduct at interception, formed a complete chain of incriminating evidence. The conviction and sentence were therefore affirmed. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47122 A conviction under customs and foreign exchange laws was sustained on the basis of a voluntary recorded statement and corroborating circumstances. The Court rejected the claim that part of the statement had been inserted by officers, treating that challenge as an afterthought, and held that the use of the word "we" was consistent with joint conduct by the accused. The surrounding facts, including interception of the vehicle at odd hours, the appellant's presence in the car, recovery of foreign-marked gold chips from the dicky, and the conduct at interception, formed a complete chain of incriminating evidence. The conviction and sentence were therefore affirmed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 24 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47122