<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 34 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47121</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Bombay High Court&#039;s interlocutory order in a case related to the violation of Section 7 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioners were granted liberty to seek additional relief from the High Court. The Special Leave Petition (SLP) was dismissed, allowing the option to approach the Bombay High Court for further recourse if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 34 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47121</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Bombay High Court&#039;s interlocutory order in a case related to the violation of Section 7 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The petitioners were granted liberty to seek additional relief from the High Court. The Special Leave Petition (SLP) was dismissed, allowing the option to approach the Bombay High Court for further recourse if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>