<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 231 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779435</link>
    <description>Assessment under section 144 read with section 144B was quashed where the assessee&#039;s reply and supporting material were not considered before the adverse order was passed. The High Court noted that the assessment proceeded on an income and loss determination proposal prepared before the detailed reply dated 08.03.2025 was examined, so the disputed TDS and purchase explanations were not evaluated. This failure to take the reply on record and to give an effective opportunity of hearing amounted to a breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Faceless Assessment Unit for fresh de novo consideration after considering the reply and, if requested, affording hearing under section 144B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 231 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779435</link>
      <description>Assessment under section 144 read with section 144B was quashed where the assessee&#039;s reply and supporting material were not considered before the adverse order was passed. The High Court noted that the assessment proceeded on an income and loss determination proposal prepared before the detailed reply dated 08.03.2025 was examined, so the disputed TDS and purchase explanations were not evaluated. This failure to take the reply on record and to give an effective opportunity of hearing amounted to a breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the Faceless Assessment Unit for fresh de novo consideration after considering the reply and, if requested, affording hearing under section 144B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>