<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 239 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779443</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s SLP for gross unexplained delay of 1,040 days. The HC had held that the assessee did not fail to disclose material facts such as would permit the AO to assume jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148 beyond four years from completion of assessment. Because the delay in filing the SLP was not satisfactorily explained, the SLP was dismissed on the ground of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 239 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779443</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s SLP for gross unexplained delay of 1,040 days. The HC had held that the assessee did not fail to disclose material facts such as would permit the AO to assume jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148 beyond four years from completion of assessment. Because the delay in filing the SLP was not satisfactorily explained, the SLP was dismissed on the ground of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>