<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 244 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779448</link>
    <description>The HC found the appellate order dated 28 Sept 2024 was passed in violation of natural justice for failing to afford the appellant a hearing and not considering their grounds or documents, set aside that order, and remanded the matter to the departmental appellate authority for fresh decision. The HC directed the authority to provide due opportunity of hearing, consider materials produced, and decide afresh on merits; petition disposed by remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 244 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779448</link>
      <description>The HC found the appellate order dated 28 Sept 2024 was passed in violation of natural justice for failing to afford the appellant a hearing and not considering their grounds or documents, set aside that order, and remanded the matter to the departmental appellate authority for fresh decision. The HC directed the authority to provide due opportunity of hearing, consider materials produced, and decide afresh on merits; petition disposed by remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>