<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47112</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, a company seeking a refund of excise duty rebate for exported goods. The respondents&#039; failure to file a counter affidavit led the court to treat the allegations as correct. The court ordered the refund of Rs. 32,84,357.86 with 12% interest per annum, emphasizing timely compliance. The judgment criticized the department&#039;s delay in refunding and directed payment within two months. Precedents supported awarding interest to prevent unfair enrichment, justifying the 12% interest rate. The decision highlighted the importance of fulfilling legal obligations promptly in excise duty rebate matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47112</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, a company seeking a refund of excise duty rebate for exported goods. The respondents&#039; failure to file a counter affidavit led the court to treat the allegations as correct. The court ordered the refund of Rs. 32,84,357.86 with 12% interest per annum, emphasizing timely compliance. The judgment criticized the department&#039;s delay in refunding and directed payment within two months. Precedents supported awarding interest to prevent unfair enrichment, justifying the 12% interest rate. The decision highlighted the importance of fulfilling legal obligations promptly in excise duty rebate matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>