<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1263 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464097</link>
    <description>Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act applies only when the statutory conditions for deemed dividend are satisfied, including the relevant shareholder relationship. On the facts found, the assessee was not a shareholder of the concerned companies, so the inter-corporate deposit could not be treated as deemed dividend. The Bombay HC also found no perversity or legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings and declined to interfere in appeal. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 15:50:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1263 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464097</link>
      <description>Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act applies only when the statutory conditions for deemed dividend are satisfied, including the relevant shareholder relationship. On the facts found, the assessee was not a shareholder of the concerned companies, so the inter-corporate deposit could not be treated as deemed dividend. The Bombay HC also found no perversity or legal error in the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings and declined to interfere in appeal. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>