<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1596 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that revisional jurisdiction under section 263 could not be invoked where the Assessing Officer had already examined the section 10A claim in the original assessment and the assessee had furnished the relevant material. It treated the revisional authority&#039;s action as a second view on an issue already considered, so the statutory preconditions for revision were not satisfied. The challenge to that order was found not to raise any substantial question of law, and the revisional order remained set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 18:15:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1596 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that revisional jurisdiction under section 263 could not be invoked where the Assessing Officer had already examined the section 10A claim in the original assessment and the assessee had furnished the relevant material. It treated the revisional authority&#039;s action as a second view on an issue already considered, so the statutory preconditions for revision were not satisfied. The challenge to that order was found not to raise any substantial question of law, and the revisional order remained set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>