https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464091 SC held the Single Judge erred where directions conflicted with the approved Allotment Rules but upheld a clarificatory bar on fresh earmarking until earlier earmarked accommodation is vacated. Discretionary out-of-turn allotments must follow House Allotment Committee recommendations with recorded reasons, avoid Rule 11(1)(e), and be capped at 10%. Pre-publication with invitation for objections was set aside; final allotment lists must be posted online. Routine dual allotments were prohibited; unguided extensions under Rule 13(5) disallowed. In the individual matter the State was directed to provide alternative accommodation within 15 days and the incumbent to vacate within two weeks, substantive claims left to the Single Judge. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Oct 2025 13:47:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464091 SC held the Single Judge erred where directions conflicted with the approved Allotment Rules but upheld a clarificatory bar on fresh earmarking until earlier earmarked accommodation is vacated. Discretionary out-of-turn allotments must follow House Allotment Committee recommendations with recorded reasons, avoid Rule 11(1)(e), and be capped at 10%. Pre-publication with invitation for objections was set aside; final allotment lists must be posted online. Routine dual allotments were prohibited; unguided extensions under Rule 13(5) disallowed. In the individual matter the State was directed to provide alternative accommodation within 15 days and the incumbent to vacate within two weeks, substantive claims left to the Single Judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464091