<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47104</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s jurisdiction to determine duty liability for all 107 consignments, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge based on the application scope. It deemed the Commission&#039;s order on additional duty liability valid, citing the petitioner&#039;s admission of under-valuation for certain consignments. Dismissing claims of procedural irregularity, the court found the Commission&#039;s reliance on DRI reports appropriate. Regarding Modvat Credit relief, the court allowed the petitioner to submit an application to the Commission. The writ petition was dismissed, the interim order vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:20:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47104</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s jurisdiction to determine duty liability for all 107 consignments, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge based on the application scope. It deemed the Commission&#039;s order on additional duty liability valid, citing the petitioner&#039;s admission of under-valuation for certain consignments. Dismissing claims of procedural irregularity, the court found the Commission&#039;s reliance on DRI reports appropriate. Regarding Modvat Credit relief, the court allowed the petitioner to submit an application to the Commission. The writ petition was dismissed, the interim order vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>