<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 169 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779373</link>
    <description>HC granted regular bail to the petitioners accused of orchestrating clandestine sale of goods, issuing no invoices and fraudulently availing/utilizing ITC through a non-existent firm. The court held that veracity of the prosecution case will be determined at trial, noted the petitioners have been in custody since 02.05.2025 while none of 25 prosecution witnesses have been examined, and found further incarceration unnecessary. Without commenting on merits, the petitions were allowed and the petitioners ordered released on bail subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned CJM/Duty Magistrate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 169 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779373</link>
      <description>HC granted regular bail to the petitioners accused of orchestrating clandestine sale of goods, issuing no invoices and fraudulently availing/utilizing ITC through a non-existent firm. The court held that veracity of the prosecution case will be determined at trial, noted the petitioners have been in custody since 02.05.2025 while none of 25 prosecution witnesses have been examined, and found further incarceration unnecessary. Without commenting on merits, the petitions were allowed and the petitioners ordered released on bail subject to furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned CJM/Duty Magistrate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>