<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779368</link>
    <description>HC held that goods found misclassified by CRCL tests could be reexported subject to conditions rather than being retained. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond for the total differential duty payable and to furnish a bank guarantee equal to 20% of the redetermined value. On compliance, the petitioner may reexport the 702 packages within twelve days. The court applied its prior approach balancing adjudication (payment of differential duty/penalty) with permitting reexportation and disposed of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779368</link>
      <description>HC held that goods found misclassified by CRCL tests could be reexported subject to conditions rather than being retained. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond for the total differential duty payable and to furnish a bank guarantee equal to 20% of the redetermined value. On compliance, the petitioner may reexport the 702 packages within twelve days. The court applied its prior approach balancing adjudication (payment of differential duty/penalty) with permitting reexportation and disposed of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>