https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779365 MADRAS HC held that Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules having been struck down, the demand framed under the impugned proceedings for the period August 2011 to March 2012 was unsustainable. The court declined to examine merits, quashed the demand issued by the revenue and allowed the petition, thereby relieving the petitioner from the contested liability for that period. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:23:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779365 MADRAS HC held that Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules having been struck down, the demand framed under the impugned proceedings for the period August 2011 to March 2012 was unsustainable. The court declined to examine merits, quashed the demand issued by the revenue and allowed the petition, thereby relieving the petitioner from the contested liability for that period. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779365