https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464089 The SC declined to interfere with the HC's ruling that the appellant is not entitled to set off TDS deducted in respect of the main contractor for which Form VAT 156 was issued. The Court left intact the HC decision and noted that if the appellant is aggrieved by denial of a refund of the forfeited amount under the impugned order, it may pursue appropriate remedies. The special leave petition and all pending applications were disposed of. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464089 The SC declined to interfere with the HC's ruling that the appellant is not entitled to set off TDS deducted in respect of the main contractor for which Form VAT 156 was issued. The Court left intact the HC decision and noted that if the appellant is aggrieved by denial of a refund of the forfeited amount under the impugned order, it may pursue appropriate remedies. The special leave petition and all pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464089