<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47101</link>
    <description>Grinding media used in ball mills for cement manufacture was discussed as a possible input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, with the exclusionary clause also in issue. The High Court noted conflicting Tribunal decisions and the parties&#039; opposing submissions on whether steel balls and cylpebs qualify as consumable inputs. It framed the legal question on eligibility for credit but did not decide the merits on the existing record. Instead, it directed the Tribunal to furnish a statement of facts under Section 135(4) so the question could be examined on a complete factual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47101</link>
      <description>Grinding media used in ball mills for cement manufacture was discussed as a possible input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, with the exclusionary clause also in issue. The High Court noted conflicting Tribunal decisions and the parties&#039; opposing submissions on whether steel balls and cylpebs qualify as consumable inputs. It framed the legal question on eligibility for credit but did not decide the merits on the existing record. Instead, it directed the Tribunal to furnish a statement of facts under Section 135(4) so the question could be examined on a complete factual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>