<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>s.153D approvals invalid where omnibus mechanical sanction without independent reasoning; assessments quashed for lack of application of mind</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93064</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the approval accorded under s.153D was a mechanical, omnibus sanction lacking any application of mind and therefore vitiated the resultant assessment orders. A single approval memo purportedly covering multiple assessment years and distinct assessees (totaling twenty-one approvals) without reference to materials reviewed or independent reasoning by the approving authority failed to satisfy statutory requisites; such rubber-stamping cannot sustain the assessments. Consequentially, the appeals by the assessees were allowed and the impugned assessment orders set aside/quashed insofar as they rested on the defective s.153D approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>s.153D approvals invalid where omnibus mechanical sanction without independent reasoning; assessments quashed for lack of application of mind</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93064</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the approval accorded under s.153D was a mechanical, omnibus sanction lacking any application of mind and therefore vitiated the resultant assessment orders. A single approval memo purportedly covering multiple assessment years and distinct assessees (totaling twenty-one approvals) without reference to materials reviewed or independent reasoning by the approving authority failed to satisfy statutory requisites; such rubber-stamping cannot sustain the assessments. Consequentially, the appeals by the assessees were allowed and the impugned assessment orders set aside/quashed insofar as they rested on the defective s.153D approval.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 08:22:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>