<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47099</link>
    <description>Proper communication of the hearing date is required under the Tribunal procedure rules, and a dismissal for non-appearance cannot stand where the record does not clearly show that notice of the next date was duly conveyed by notice or authorised endorsement. Rule 20 permits restoration on sufficient cause, and that expression must be construed liberally and in a justice-oriented manner rather than pedantically. On the facts noted, the restoration application ought to have been allowed, and the Tribunal&#039;s refusal was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47099</link>
      <description>Proper communication of the hearing date is required under the Tribunal procedure rules, and a dismissal for non-appearance cannot stand where the record does not clearly show that notice of the next date was duly conveyed by notice or authorised endorsement. Rule 20 permits restoration on sufficient cause, and that expression must be construed liberally and in a justice-oriented manner rather than pedantically. On the facts noted, the restoration application ought to have been allowed, and the Tribunal&#039;s refusal was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>