<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47096</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, setting aside the order of CEGAT dismissing the appeal due to delay and remitted the matter back for expeditious disposal. The Court found genuine misunderstanding and mistaken legal advice as sufficient cause to condone the delay, ordering the petitioners to pay costs. Emphasizing timely consideration, the Court directed CEGAT to decide the appeal on its merits within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47096</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, setting aside the order of CEGAT dismissing the appeal due to delay and remitted the matter back for expeditious disposal. The Court found genuine misunderstanding and mistaken legal advice as sufficient cause to condone the delay, ordering the petitioners to pay costs. Emphasizing timely consideration, the Court directed CEGAT to decide the appeal on its merits within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>