<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1621 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464081</link>
    <description>Cable television network services were examined in the context of whether consideration attributable to set top boxes could be brought to tax under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 without an enabling charging provision. The analysis states that the provider remained a service provider, and the mere presence of an element relatable to supply of goods did not by itself justify VAT levy. It further states that tax liability cannot be imposed through calculation, bifurcation or apportionment of the total value unless the charging statute first authorises such a levy. On that basis, no VAT liability was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 18:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1621 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464081</link>
      <description>Cable television network services were examined in the context of whether consideration attributable to set top boxes could be brought to tax under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 without an enabling charging provision. The analysis states that the provider remained a service provider, and the mere presence of an element relatable to supply of goods did not by itself justify VAT levy. It further states that tax liability cannot be imposed through calculation, bifurcation or apportionment of the total value unless the charging statute first authorises such a levy. On that basis, no VAT liability was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>