<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464082</link>
    <description>Interim custody of imported goods was conditioned on the applicant producing address proof and identity proof, so that notice in the adjudication proceedings could be served at that address and the applicant could participate. The High Court accepted this additional safeguard to protect the department&#039;s interest, while leaving the Single Judge&#039;s order otherwise unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 18:59:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1408 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464082</link>
      <description>Interim custody of imported goods was conditioned on the applicant producing address proof and identity proof, so that notice in the adjudication proceedings could be served at that address and the applicant could participate. The High Court accepted this additional safeguard to protect the department&#039;s interest, while leaving the Single Judge&#039;s order otherwise unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>