<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 111 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47079</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and directing the petitioner to deposit a cost. The Tribunal was instructed to decide the appeal on merits within six months, disregarding any court observations on merits. The petitioner must ensure timely disposal of the appeal without seeking further adjournments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 111 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47079</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and directing the petitioner to deposit a cost. The Tribunal was instructed to decide the appeal on merits within six months, disregarding any court observations on merits. The petitioner must ensure timely disposal of the appeal without seeking further adjournments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>