<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal dismissed; department failed to challenge self-assessed Bills of Entry, so declared customs valuation must be accepted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93024</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order, holding that the department failed to challenge or amend the respondent&#039;s self-assessed Bills of Entry as required, so the declared customs valuation must be accepted. The Tribunal&#039;s application of the controlling legal principle concerning self-assessment and absence of departmental challenge was found plausible and not perverse. The appellant did not demonstrate any procedural or substantive error in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning. The HC further noted the de minimis monetary stake of Rs. 73,000 and observed that the appeal lacked merit. The appeal is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal dismissed; department failed to challenge self-assessed Bills of Entry, so declared customs valuation must be accepted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93024</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order, holding that the department failed to challenge or amend the respondent&#039;s self-assessed Bills of Entry as required, so the declared customs valuation must be accepted. The Tribunal&#039;s application of the controlling legal principle concerning self-assessment and absence of departmental challenge was found plausible and not perverse. The appellant did not demonstrate any procedural or substantive error in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning. The HC further noted the de minimis monetary stake of Rs. 73,000 and observed that the appeal lacked merit. The appeal is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>