<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 64 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779268</link>
    <description>HC upheld reopening of assessment and dismissed the writ appeals, finding that defective C-Forms supplied to the respondent firm justified denial of concessional CST and assessment at the full 10% rate. The court held the concessional 2% treatment, initially allowed, was vitiated by the forms&#039; defects; on audit objection the assessment was validly reopened and liability for CST at the full rate sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 64 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779268</link>
      <description>HC upheld reopening of assessment and dismissed the writ appeals, finding that defective C-Forms supplied to the respondent firm justified denial of concessional CST and assessment at the full 10% rate. The court held the concessional 2% treatment, initially allowed, was vitiated by the forms&#039; defects; on audit objection the assessment was validly reopened and liability for CST at the full rate sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>