<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 65 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779269</link>
    <description>Validity of the amended U.P. Trade Tax Rules was challenged on the ground that forms issued for a particular financial year could be applied to transactions of the two preceding years, including transactions not disputed by the Department. The Supreme Court noted that the same issue had already been considered in M/s K.B. Hides, where no reason was found to interfere. Applying the principle of consistency and judicial discipline, the Court dismissed the civil appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 65 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779269</link>
      <description>Validity of the amended U.P. Trade Tax Rules was challenged on the ground that forms issued for a particular financial year could be applied to transactions of the two preceding years, including transactions not disputed by the Department. The Supreme Court noted that the same issue had already been considered in M/s K.B. Hides, where no reason was found to interfere. Applying the principle of consistency and judicial discipline, the Court dismissed the civil appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>