https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779273 AT found that retention of seized articles, including gold, violated natural justice because the Adjudicating Authority failed to issue the mandatory >=30-day notice under section 8(1) of the Act to the appellant company to disclose source of assets. The property was shown in the company's name, so relying on a shareholder or director to respond without corporate authority was improper. Appeal disposed by remand: matter returned to the Adjudicating Authority to serve the prescribed notice on the appellant company and proceed in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:24:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779273 AT found that retention of seized articles, including gold, violated natural justice because the Adjudicating Authority failed to issue the mandatory >=30-day notice under section 8(1) of the Act to the appellant company to disclose source of assets. The property was shown in the company's name, so relying on a shareholder or director to respond without corporate authority was improper. Appeal disposed by remand: matter returned to the Adjudicating Authority to serve the prescribed notice on the appellant company and proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779273