<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 77 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779281</link>
    <description>SC disposed the appeals on the ground of low tax effect, holding maintainability lacking due to the limited monetary implication. The tribunal&#039;s view-that revision of price, demand of differential duty and interest, confiscation of the imported machine and penalties for alleged under-declaration were not sustainable-was upheld for disposal purposes. The court left any substantive question of law undecided, to be determined in an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 77 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779281</link>
      <description>SC disposed the appeals on the ground of low tax effect, holding maintainability lacking due to the limited monetary implication. The tribunal&#039;s view-that revision of price, demand of differential duty and interest, confiscation of the imported machine and penalties for alleged under-declaration were not sustainable-was upheld for disposal purposes. The court left any substantive question of law undecided, to be determined in an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>