<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779291</link>
    <description>ITAT directed the AO to compute tax on a Rs.20 lakh addition under s.69A as unexplained deposit by applying the pre-amendment s.115BBE tax rate of 30% (rather than 60% under the amended provision effective 01.04.2017). The Tribunal followed coordinate-bench authority and allowed the assessee&#039;s additional ground, remitting the matter for tax determination accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 87 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779291</link>
      <description>ITAT directed the AO to compute tax on a Rs.20 lakh addition under s.69A as unexplained deposit by applying the pre-amendment s.115BBE tax rate of 30% (rather than 60% under the amended provision effective 01.04.2017). The Tribunal followed coordinate-bench authority and allowed the assessee&#039;s additional ground, remitting the matter for tax determination accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>