<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 95 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779299</link>
    <description>Section 153C jurisdiction requires a satisfaction note that specifically identifies the seized material and correlates it document-wise and year-wise to the assessee and the relevant assessment years. A consolidated note that does not show which documents belong to or pertain to the assessee, or how each item is relevant to each year, is insufficient to confer valid jurisdiction. On that reasoning, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 153C was held invalid, and the assessee succeeded on the jurisdictional challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 95 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779299</link>
      <description>Section 153C jurisdiction requires a satisfaction note that specifically identifies the seized material and correlates it document-wise and year-wise to the assessee and the relevant assessment years. A consolidated note that does not show which documents belong to or pertain to the assessee, or how each item is relevant to each year, is insufficient to confer valid jurisdiction. On that reasoning, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 153C was held invalid, and the assessee succeeded on the jurisdictional challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>