<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 99 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779303</link>
    <description>Reassessment concerning the taxability of live feed as royalty and bifurcation of licence fees between live and recorded content was not examined by the Supreme Court. The assessee stated that it would challenge the final assessment order on its merits, without relying on the reopening grounds previously raised against the order under section 148A(d). As no reopening challenge was to be pursued, the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the High Court&#039;s setting aside of the reassessment order and notice was not considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 99 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779303</link>
      <description>Reassessment concerning the taxability of live feed as royalty and bifurcation of licence fees between live and recorded content was not examined by the Supreme Court. The assessee stated that it would challenge the final assessment order on its merits, without relying on the reopening grounds previously raised against the order under section 148A(d). As no reopening challenge was to be pursued, the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the High Court&#039;s setting aside of the reassessment order and notice was not considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>