<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47071</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot condone delays beyond 30 days. Additionally, the Tribunal is not obligated to consider the appeal on its merits if dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals), aligning with legislative intent for timely resolution of fiscal matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47071</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot condone delays beyond 30 days. Additionally, the Tribunal is not obligated to consider the appeal on its merits if dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (Appeals), aligning with legislative intent for timely resolution of fiscal matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>