https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47065 The Court found the challenge to the preliminary findings premature and clarified that an appeal does not lie against such findings. The Court directed the Central Government to consider the petitioner's representation before imposing provisional duty and allowed interveners to make representations as well. The petition was disposed of with these directions, permitting direct service and ordering applicants to be arrayed as respondents in the Special Civil Application, emphasizing the importance of Central Government's consideration before imposing provisional duty. en-us Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:33:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47065 The Court found the challenge to the preliminary findings premature and clarified that an appeal does not lie against such findings. The Court directed the Central Government to consider the petitioner's representation before imposing provisional duty and allowed interveners to make representations as well. The petition was disposed of with these directions, permitting direct service and ordering applicants to be arrayed as respondents in the Special Civil Application, emphasizing the importance of Central Government's consideration before imposing provisional duty. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47065