<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand cases for de novo consideration under Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even after the Finance Act, 2001 amendment. It dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court precedents over conflicting Tribunal decisions, thus affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; power of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) to remand cases for de novo consideration under Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even after the Finance Act, 2001 amendment. It dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court precedents over conflicting Tribunal decisions, thus affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; power of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>