<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1815 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464072</link>
    <description>Interconnect service charges paid for telecom connectivity were held not to constitute royalty, because the issue was covered by an earlier co-ordinate Bench decision treating payments for interconnect services and transfer of capacity in foreign countries as outside the scope of royalty. Applying that precedent, the Court found no infirmity in the order under challenge and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 13:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1815 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464072</link>
      <description>Interconnect service charges paid for telecom connectivity were held not to constitute royalty, because the issue was covered by an earlier co-ordinate Bench decision treating payments for interconnect services and transfer of capacity in foreign countries as outside the scope of royalty. Applying that precedent, the Court found no infirmity in the order under challenge and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>