https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47051 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned order demanding additional duty due to the absence of formal adjudication supporting the duty demand. The court emphasized the necessity of proper adjudication before enforcing additional duty and highlighted the importance of following due process to ensure the legality of duty demands. Both parties were directed to settle the matter within a month, with the petitioner given a specific date to present objections, failing which orders would be passed based on merits without further notice. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:35:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47051 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned order demanding additional duty due to the absence of formal adjudication supporting the duty demand. The court emphasized the necessity of proper adjudication before enforcing additional duty and highlighted the importance of following due process to ensure the legality of duty demands. Both parties were directed to settle the matter within a month, with the petitioner given a specific date to present objections, failing which orders would be passed based on merits without further notice. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47051