<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ruling upholds seizure and notebooks as proof of large-scale suppressed turnover; burden shifted to taxpayer to rebut</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92979</link>
    <description>The HC affirms that inspection and seizure disclosed largescale suppression of purchases, sales and stock; private notebooks and an admission at inspection established transactions outside books. Once suppression was established, the burden shifted to the respondent to prove the entries were mere job-work (&quot;coolie conversion&quot;), which was not discharged and was raised only on appeal. The Assessing Officer&#039;s determination of suppressed turnover, grounded on seized material and contemporaneous statements, was upheld as evidentiary and rational. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s and Tribunal&#039;s deletions of assessed turnover were set aside. The Assessing Officer&#039;s order is restored, the tax revision is allowed, and the substantial questions of law are answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Ruling upholds seizure and notebooks as proof of large-scale suppressed turnover; burden shifted to taxpayer to rebut</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92979</link>
      <description>The HC affirms that inspection and seizure disclosed largescale suppression of purchases, sales and stock; private notebooks and an admission at inspection established transactions outside books. Once suppression was established, the burden shifted to the respondent to prove the entries were mere job-work (&quot;coolie conversion&quot;), which was not discharged and was raised only on appeal. The Assessing Officer&#039;s determination of suppressed turnover, grounded on seized material and contemporaneous statements, was upheld as evidentiary and rational. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s and Tribunal&#039;s deletions of assessed turnover were set aside. The Assessing Officer&#039;s order is restored, the tax revision is allowed, and the substantial questions of law are answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>