<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779206</link>
    <description>An unconditional withdrawal of a special leave petition challenging an order, without liberty to file afresh or revive the challenge if review fails, bars a second special leave petition against the same order on the principle reflected in Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC as a matter of public policy. An appeal does not lie from the dismissal of a review petition, because Order XLVII Rule 7(1) CPC bars an appeal from an order refusing review. Authorities on non-speaking dismissal of special leave petitions and merger were held inapplicable where the earlier challenge had been withdrawn without liberty. The second challenge was therefore held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779206</link>
      <description>An unconditional withdrawal of a special leave petition challenging an order, without liberty to file afresh or revive the challenge if review fails, bars a second special leave petition against the same order on the principle reflected in Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC as a matter of public policy. An appeal does not lie from the dismissal of a review petition, because Order XLVII Rule 7(1) CPC bars an appeal from an order refusing review. Authorities on non-speaking dismissal of special leave petitions and merger were held inapplicable where the earlier challenge had been withdrawn without liberty. The second challenge was therefore held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>