<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 3 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779207</link>
    <description>MADRAS HIGH COURT (HC) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s determination of suppressed turnover, finding large-scale suppression in purchases, sales and stock supported by seized private notebooks and the dealer&#039;s admission at inspection. The court rejected the late-raised &quot;coolie conversion&quot; plea for lack of corroborative evidence and held the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal erred in deleting the additions without material to displace the AO&#039;s findings. The AO&#039;s order was restored, the appellate and tribunal orders set aside, the tax revision allowed, and substantial questions of law answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 3 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779207</link>
      <description>MADRAS HIGH COURT (HC) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s determination of suppressed turnover, finding large-scale suppression in purchases, sales and stock supported by seized private notebooks and the dealer&#039;s admission at inspection. The court rejected the late-raised &quot;coolie conversion&quot; plea for lack of corroborative evidence and held the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal erred in deleting the additions without material to displace the AO&#039;s findings. The AO&#039;s order was restored, the appellate and tribunal orders set aside, the tax revision allowed, and substantial questions of law answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>