<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779229</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act was found unsustainable where the recorded reasons for reopening were based on cash deposits in the bank account, but the completed assessment made an addition only for unsecured loans. The jurisdictional link between the material relied on for reopening and the addition ultimately made was not established, so the reopening could not be sustained. The reassessment was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779229</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Income-tax Act was found unsustainable where the recorded reasons for reopening were based on cash deposits in the bank account, but the completed assessment made an addition only for unsecured loans. The jurisdictional link between the material relied on for reopening and the addition ultimately made was not established, so the reopening could not be sustained. The reassessment was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>