<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 27 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779231</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80P was denied because the return of income was filed after the due date under section 139(1) and the delay was not condoned under section 119(2)(b) read with the relevant CBDT circular. Without condonation, the claim could not be entertained on a belated return, so the disallowance was sustained and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 27 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779231</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80P was denied because the return of income was filed after the due date under section 139(1) and the delay was not condoned under section 119(2)(b) read with the relevant CBDT circular. Without condonation, the claim could not be entertained on a belated return, so the disallowance was sustained and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>