<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 46 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779250</link>
    <description>ITAT (Chennai) dismissed the appeal of the assessee-society, upholding denial of deduction under s.80P (and s.80AC) because the return of income was filed belatedly under s.148 and not within the statutory due date. The Tribunal followed the Madras HC precedent that eligibility for s.80P deduction requires timely filing of the return, and found no reason to depart from that principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 46 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779250</link>
      <description>ITAT (Chennai) dismissed the appeal of the assessee-society, upholding denial of deduction under s.80P (and s.80AC) because the return of income was filed belatedly under s.148 and not within the statutory due date. The Tribunal followed the Madras HC precedent that eligibility for s.80P deduction requires timely filing of the return, and found no reason to depart from that principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>