https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47040 The court dismissed the challenge to the writ petition against the Settlement Commission's decision, ruling that the High Power Committee's involvement was not necessary as the conditions for its intervention were not met. The judge affirmed the Settlement Commission's role in adjudicating disputes under the Customs Act and emphasized the High Court's exclusive jurisdiction for judicial review under Articles 226 and 227. The parties were directed to submit necessary affidavits for an expedited resolution, maintaining the status quo while leaving other issues open for further arguments. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:52:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47040 The court dismissed the challenge to the writ petition against the Settlement Commission's decision, ruling that the High Power Committee's involvement was not necessary as the conditions for its intervention were not met. The judge affirmed the Settlement Commission's role in adjudicating disputes under the Customs Act and emphasized the High Court's exclusive jurisdiction for judicial review under Articles 226 and 227. The parties were directed to submit necessary affidavits for an expedited resolution, maintaining the status quo while leaving other issues open for further arguments. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47040