<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 56 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779260</link>
    <description>An expressly stipulated tender condition requiring upload of the latest GSTR-3B return with the bid was held to be mandatory, and compliance after the bid deadline did not cure the defect. The Court treated the omission as a material deviation under Rule 59 of the Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013, affecting bid responsiveness rather than a curable procedural lapse. It also reiterated that writ interference in tender matters is limited: the procuring authority&#039;s interpretation of its conditions will not be disturbed absent mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality, or overriding public interest. On these principles, the challenge to the tender decision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 56 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779260</link>
      <description>An expressly stipulated tender condition requiring upload of the latest GSTR-3B return with the bid was held to be mandatory, and compliance after the bid deadline did not cure the defect. The Court treated the omission as a material deviation under Rule 59 of the Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2013, affecting bid responsiveness rather than a curable procedural lapse. It also reiterated that writ interference in tender matters is limited: the procuring authority&#039;s interpretation of its conditions will not be disturbed absent mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality, or overriding public interest. On these principles, the challenge to the tender decision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>