<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1705 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464056</link>
    <description>A bail order in a grave offence may be set aside where the court ignores the nature and seriousness of the allegations, prima facie investigative material, and the risk of prejudicing trial, or wrongly undertakes a mini-trial on witness credibility and merits; the High Court&#039;s order was therefore unsustainable. A delay or defect in communicating the grounds of arrest does not, by itself, justify bail unless prejudice is shown, and a mere procedural lapse cannot override the seriousness of the charge and the material on record; the grant of bail on that basis was also incorrect. The bail orders were annulled and custody directed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1705 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464056</link>
      <description>A bail order in a grave offence may be set aside where the court ignores the nature and seriousness of the allegations, prima facie investigative material, and the risk of prejudicing trial, or wrongly undertakes a mini-trial on witness credibility and merits; the High Court&#039;s order was therefore unsustainable. A delay or defect in communicating the grounds of arrest does not, by itself, justify bail unless prejudice is shown, and a mere procedural lapse cannot override the seriousness of the charge and the material on record; the grant of bail on that basis was also incorrect. The bail orders were annulled and custody directed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>