https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464068 HC held that both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and the Faceless Assessing Officer have concurrent jurisdiction to reopen assessments. The Court followed existing coordinate-bench precedents and declined relief sought by the petitioner, noting similar petitions have been dismissed and appeals are pending before the SC without stays; revenue proceedings may continue subject to any caveats in pending appeals. The HC treated the prior decision as binding in Delhi unless a larger Bench takes a contrary view. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2025 20:02:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464068 HC held that both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and the Faceless Assessing Officer have concurrent jurisdiction to reopen assessments. The Court followed existing coordinate-bench precedents and declined relief sought by the petitioner, noting similar petitions have been dismissed and appeals are pending before the SC without stays; revenue proceedings may continue subject to any caveats in pending appeals. The HC treated the prior decision as binding in Delhi unless a larger Bench takes a contrary view. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464068