<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 751 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464053</link>
    <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s finding that the U.P. Trade Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2001 are constitutionally valid. The Court held no illegality in the amendment or the impugned order dated August 14, 2002, observing that potential hardship to some dealers does not invalidate the rules. Finding no reason to interfere, SC dismissed the special leave petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 751 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464053</link>
      <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s finding that the U.P. Trade Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2001 are constitutionally valid. The Court held no illegality in the amendment or the impugned order dated August 14, 2002, observing that potential hardship to some dealers does not invalidate the rules. Finding no reason to interfere, SC dismissed the special leave petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>